Nearly three-quarters of Texas’ abortion facilities would be forced to close by the end of this month if one of the nation’s toughest new anti-abortion laws is allowed to take effect, attorneys for clinics challenging the law told a federal judge Monday.
U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel in Austin will rule on the latest challenge to the sweeping abortion restrictions that Texas’ Republican-led Legislature passed last year. Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican who is the favorite to become governor next year, is defending the restrictions.
Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood’s case against Arizona’s restrictions on abortion medication has been put on hold while state officials appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. State attorneys say they will ask the Supreme Court to overturn a temporary stay on the rules that regulate where and how women can take abortion-inducing drugs. The rules also block the use of abortion medication after the seventh week of pregnancy instead of the ninth. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in April issued an injunction on the rules while the case against them plays out in federal court in Tucson. But that case will now be on hold while Arizona appeals. Opponents say the rules would force hundreds of women to undergo surgicalabortions. Arizona says they protect women’s health.
In the Texas case, the trial began as a federal judge in Alabama on Monday blocked a law in that state requiring doctors at abortion clinics to have hospital admitting privileges. There are currently 18 abortion clinics operating in Texas. All of them would close if Yeakel upholds a law set to take effect Sept. 1 that would require the clinics to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centers. That would leave just seven places for women to legally terminate a pregnancy in Texas — all surgical centers in major cities, including four operated by Planned Parenthood.
Women living near the Mexico border would be most affected, as many would face a four-hour drive to get to the closest U.S. abortion provider. Attorneys for the state contend that the distance doesn’t pose an undue burden, saying women in El Paso could quickly reach an abortion provider by driving across state lines.
"We all know they can go 10-15 minutes down the street into New Mexico," said Jimmy Blacklock, a deputy attorney general.
A U.S. appeals court last week took a dim view of that argument over a Mississippi law that would close that state’s only abortion clinic. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Mississippi may not shift its obligation for established constitutional rights of its citizens — in this case, getting an abortion — to another state.
Blacklock, who acknowledged the Mississippi decision in his opening arguments, said the Texas law ensures women’s health. He said 85 percent of Texas women would still live within a three-hour drive of an abortion provider if the law takes effect.
bortion providers say they don’t have the money to upgrade their facilities or build new ones that meet the more rigid medical requirements of surgical centers. They told Yeakel that nearly 1 million women in Texas would be further than 150 miles from an abortion provider and predicted that more women will dangerously attempt to terminate their own pregnancies.
"This will actually expose women to greater health risks," said Jan Soifer, an attorney representing Whole Woman’s Health and other abortion clinics.
The trial is expected to last four days, and appeals no matter Yeakel’s ruling are expected.
Both abortion-rights supporters and opponents crowded the federal courthouse in Austin. Among them was a woman wearing the now-famous pink sneakers worn by Democratic state Sen. Wendy Davis last summer during her nearly 13-hour filibuster that temporarily delayed passage of the law. Davis is now running against Abbott in the race to succeed Gov. Rick Perry next year.
And today we celebrate...